Category Archives: Political Science & Economics

My Tax Plan

Our government is broken. I’ve written a bunch of posts on US government policy but I haven’t put forth many specifics. That’s going to change. This is the first post in a series about how I’d fix the US. Potential political career disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinons when presented with new evidence. That’s what smart people do. That doesn’t make them a flip-flopper.

At nearly 75,000 pages and growing, nearly everyone agrees the tax code is broken. But US taxes are one of the most controversial and yet least understood parts of our government. In order to fix our debt problem, we need to address revenue and spending. Anyone who says we can fix our problem with one or the other is just not credible. My plan would raise a bit more revenue for the government and make it more fairly distributed to US citizens. I fully understand it would never pass.

Simplify

At 75,000 pages only those with massive incomes can afford to pay lawyers and accountants to legally evade taxes. My Dad is an attorney and he struggles to make sense of his rather simple tax return. I’ve been assessed penalties by the IRS three times for honest mistakes on my business taxes.

Complexity is why people making $100m a year use offshore accounts and those making $75,000 don’t. It’s one of the reasons Warren Buffet pays a lower percentage in taxes than his secretary . Facebook can afford to take advantage of the rules to save itself money. Complexity helps the rich and sophisticated at the expense of the rest of us.

We also waste billions of dollars trying to enforce our byzantine tax code. Not to mention the millions of man hours per year.

Increase Fairness

Although nearly all of the attention gets focused on the income tax rate, it only makes up 42% of all US Federal tax revenue. We have massive fights over the income tax, but what about the other 58%? Our income tax is progressive, but most of the rest of our taxes are regressive and hurt the poor over the rich.

Promote Investment not Speculation

Our current tax code doesn’t really differentiate between speculation and investment. Our biggest problems have come from speculation at the expense of investment. My tax code gives you promotes investment in our future.

My Plan

1. Income Tax

Our 75,000 page tax code could be simplified to four sentences. Our tax return could be simplified to a post card.

My income tax would have three brackets, 5%, 25% and 35%. The first $10,000 would be free. I’d eliminate all tax deductions. Brackets would be set to get similar revenue to what we have today, plus a bit more to cover our shortfall.

2. Payroll Tax: Social Security, Medicare Tax & Self Employment Tax

I would completely eliminate the payroll tax and raise income tax rates and eliminate deductions to get more revenue from income taxes. Income taxes and reduced deductions would have to rise greatly because payroll tax accounts for 40% of federal revenue.

The payroll tax and self employment tax are two taxes taken out of our paychecks. 15.6% of our paycheck goes to the government to pay for Social Security and Medicare. If you are an employee, you pay half out of your paycheck and your employer pays the other half. If you work for yourself, you pay both halves. This tax is poorly designed for three main reasons.

First, it disincentivizes entrepreneurship and self employment.It punishes self employed people and entrepreneurs. We have to pay 15.6% of our income to the government, whereas an employee only pays half of that. Second, it discourages companies from hiring. Companies are required to pay 7.8% of an employees salary in taxes when they hire them. That’s not good for an economy fighting through high unemployment. Third, it’s incredibly regressive. It only affects the first $100,000 of income, meaning that if you make $400,000 in a year, you only pay an effective rate of about 4% while a self employed person making $40,000 pays the full 15.6%.

3. Corporate Taxes

Flat rate of 10% on all corporate income. No exceptions.

This change would lower the burden on small corporations that are currently paying 15-35% and increase the burden on the biggest companies like Facebook, GE and others who pay 0% because they’ve hired expensive attorneys and accountants to shirk their burden with tricks like the double irish.

4. Dividend income and Interest Tax

10% flat rate on all income from dividends and interest. This income generally comes from money that’s already been taxed from income or other investment taxes, so it’s not fair to tax again at a high rate. It’s also counter productive.

5. Carried Interest

Taxed as normal income.

This is the odious loophole that hedge funds and bankers use to pay 15% taxes on their billions in income each year. It should be a crime, but our government is unwilling to make changes. This is probably the most unfair tax on the books. VCs currently benefit from it, but under my plan they’d go into capital gains since they are investing.

6. Capital Gains Tax

In year one, you pay your income tax rate. In year two, it’s your rate minus 5% points. Year 3, minus 10% points. In year 5 you pay 0%.

Capital Gains are money that you make investing in stocks, companies, real estate and other things that you later sell at a higher price. The current system is you pay income tax rates in year 1, then if you wait more than a year, you pay 15%. The goal is to incentivize risk taking and investment, but holding a stock for one year is not enough. An investment is long term and you should get big benefits if you really invest for the long haul instead of speculating with an under two year time horizon.

7. Estate Tax

25% on all estates over $7.5m.

This is one of the most debated taxes right after the income tax, but it only affects 13,000 estates per year. When someone dies and their total assets (property+investments+cash) is over a certain amount, the estate must pay taxes. The goal is to eliminate family inheritance of billions that create an idle rich class. Many say it’s unfair to double tax the money because it’s already been subject to income and investment taxes while the person was living, but I don’t believe so. 25% on all assets above $10m, indexed to inflation, is fair.

Conclusion

I have not done all of the math to make sure that my rates make sense. If they are too low to get our current levels of revenue, I’d increase the income tax rates. If they are too high, which I highly doubt, I’d reduce them. The goal of this post was to create a framework that makes sense to simplify our tax code and make it more fair.

What do you think?

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Taxing and Spending

cc: bornsquishy.com

On the first day of my freshman year of college I was 5’9 and weighed in at 150 pounds. That’s 1.75m and 68 kilos for my foreign readers. I was in really good shape. By the end of second semester, I was still 5’9, but weighed 166 pounds (75kg) and was in terrible shape. How’d that happen? Easy. I went from an active high schooler who played soccer 3 times a week, lifted weights 5 days a week, and reffed 120+ soccer games each year who ate good, healthy food at my parents house, to an inactive college kid who played soccer or racquetball once a week, reffed 50 games a year, ate pizza, “chinese food”, dorm cafeteria food, desserts and drank heavily 3+ days per week. That was freshman year. Sixteen pounds in nine months.

By the start of sophomore year, 3 months later, I’d lost it all. As soon as I got out of the dorms, I drank less, ate better and started to bike five days a week and played and reffed more soccer. During the stress of selling my first business, I gained more weight from eating poorly and not exercising. This time, I took off the weight by changing my diet, but not increasing exercise. I lost weight, but ended up weak. I wasn’t really in shape. Other times I tried to get back in shape by only doing exercise, but that never worked. I got stronger, but still was heavy. I wasn’t particularly healthy. The only thing that got me healthy was a change in diet and increased exercise in some combination.

The United States government is overweight. We got there the same way I did: eating more (increasing spending) and exercising less (cutting taxes). We have $15 trillion dollars in debt that’s expected to balloon over the next generation. But unfortunately we’re not fifteen pounds overweight, we’re more like 200 pounds heavier than we should be. We’re 5’9 and 350 pounds (1.75m and 159kg).

The Republicans say that we should go on a diet (cut spending) but keep on with our sedentary ways. If we just stopped eating so much and we won’t be fat anymore. Many Democrats say that we should just exercise more (increase taxes) and keep on eating. If we do that we’ll get in shape.

If we follow the Republican play of eating less, we’ll lose weight. But we’ll lose both fat and muscle. At the end of our diet, we’ll be weaker, but weigh less. We’ll be at our ideal weight, but we won’t be in shape. If we follow the Democratic plan of exercising more, we’ll get stronger, but we won’t lose much weight. We’ll still have too much fat along with our newfound muscle. Both plans end up with unhealthy economies. And if we cut food so much, we could starve to death. Our internal organs could shut down. But if we go into an intense exercise plan as a 350 pound 5’8 man, we could have a severe heart attack.

Just like with getting healthy, the only approach that makes sense is a change in diet and exercise in coorinated combination. We need to cut spending, reallocate our priorities and increase taxes. That’s the only way our country gets healthy again. That’s the middle way that our country needs.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

The Biggest Gamble in World History

The Federal Reserve just announced it would continue its program of buying up US bonds and mortgage backed securities to keep rates low. They plan to buy $85b per month until it’s not needed anymore. That’s $3b per day. Or $283 per month for every man woman and child in the US. Where does that money come from? Our taxes? Borrowing from the Chinese? No.

We just create it out of thin air. We tell people we have it, add some numbers to a spreadsheet and boom, we have $85bn in new dollars! What a great idea! Then we use it to buy debt issued by the United States. This keeps interest rates artificially low because there are fewer US bonds on the open market. People who want to buy bonds compete over the only remaining bonds and drive down interest rates. It works the same way for mortgage backed securities.

Get it? If not, here’s another example. Say I want to buy a $1m house but I don’t have any money. I meet with the seller and say “I have one million dollars in my bank account, give me the house.” The guy believes me and gives me the house. On the way home, by some magical power, I decide that I have $1m in my account and create it out of thin air. Then I transfer it to the seller. That’s what the Federal Reserve is doing.

So why don’t we just print $16 trillion and pay off all of our debt at once? We could do it. But here’s the problem. If we do it, everyone with government debt would be rich and everyone without it would be poor. We’d kill anyone without government paper. And everyone without their newfound wealth would buy up everything else. In otherwords, massive, overnight inflation.

Ok, so why not $8 trillion? Same problem. $4 trillion? Still too much. $1 trillion over a year? That sounds ok. And that’s what we’re doing. $85b*12 months=$1.02 trillion in new money created each year. So we’re just creating money out of thin air, keeping interest rates low and hoping we can slowly inflate our debt away. We’ll keep increasing our money printing until we hear complaints from the rest of the world or the bond market. If nobody complains, we’ll buy $150b/month of our bonds. Then $200b.

That, I believe, is Wall Street and Washington’s master plan to get out of debt. The increased taxes and spending cuts of the fiscal cliff are a mere sideshow to distract the citizens and our investors to make us think that we’re actually serious about reform. For a myraid of reasons, we’re not. So we’ll try to avoid pain and inflate ourselves out of the problem.

Sounds great, right? Don’t really raise taxes, don’t really cut spending and make our debt worthless. Inflation in combination with real reform could be good, but unfortunately this plan destroys certain groups of people:

The poor

The poor spend a huge percentage of their income on food, housing and basic needs. These basic needs go up when we print money. Public assistance payment cost of living increases don’t keep up with inflation. Food, gas, rent increase. Inflation squeezes the poor.

The middle class

The middle class gets hit by rising food and commodity prices, but they also have savings. If they have $10,000 in a CD earning 1%, but inflation is 3%, they’re actually losing 2% each year. Creating money out of thin air erodes their savings and purchasing power.

Anyone on a fixed income

People on social security, retirees, people on disability or welfare are destroyed by persistant inflation. Each time we create $85b out of thin air, that social security check purchases less.

Savers, retirees and pretty much anyone with a net worth of less than ~$50m

These savers planned on being able to live off of their savings. But what are your savings worth when the government can just create money each month? Less and less each month.

So if creating money out of thin air hurts all of these groups, why is it happening? Because we either have to make hard choices to cut benefits and raise taxes. People want to raise taxes on the rich, but when it comes to cutting spending, if they’re affected they scream. And our government appeases us.

Our government is gambling that it can create enough money to keep interest rates low without pissing off our foreign investors or the rich who could affect the bond market. This gamble works until our investors say it doesn’t anymore. At that point, interest rates go up. Potentially from today’s 1% to 7-10% really quickly. And then the US is in trouble.

Short of seriously cutting spending and increasing taxes, this is our only hope. And it’s the hope our  government has hitched it’s wagon to. At some point in the future, our investors will call us on our persistant inflation. But if we stop and just massively cut spending, we could go into deflation like Europe. If the gamble doesn’t pay off, we’ll have a bigger bubble than we’ve ever seen in this history of the world, this time in US debt. We need to hope it does. Our third option between printing money and austerity is not any more politically feasible than it was when I wrote about it in April.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

College Advice

Over Thanksgiving dinner, I talked with my neighbor, a smart high school senior, about where he wanted to go to college. But before we got too far in, he told me a number that shocked me: $20,000. That’s the cost of instate tuition, fees, books, and dorms at the University of Wisconsin. When I attended in 2004 for my freshman year, it was ~$14,000. He’s clearly smart enough to do the work at Wisconsin, but he’s doing the mental calculus and see’s he’ll save $20,000 over two years and end up with the same degree if he goes to a cheaper school and transfers in. That’s a tough decision.

Like most 17 year olds, he’s not sure what he wants to do in life. And there’s nothing wrong with that. At 27 I still don’t know what I want to do in life. But to go to school to figure out what he wants is now going to cost at least $80,000 for four years at a good school. If he were to go to a private school it’d cost upwards of $200,000 for four years. And with many students taking 5 years, he’s at between $100,000 and $250,000 in the hole as a 22 year old. That’s absolute insanity. Especially since college doesn’t guarantee you a job that will let you pay that debt back anytime soon anymore.

We are going through the biggest economic shift since 1750 when the industrial revolution reshaped our economies. That change took 100+ years. We’re 40 years into the new revolution today. Software and robots are eating the world. In the 1970s, low skilled jobs mainly filled by urban minorities were eliminated. Our economy didn’t need them anymore. Shamefully, pretty much nobody cared. In the 90s, computers, robots and outsourcing began to eliminate manufacturing jobs. People started to take notice, but many figured it was progress. We’re moving to a knowledge economy.

But that all changed in 2007-2009. That recession eliminated the last vestiges of the old manufacturing systems, leaning out the workforce via increased efficiency from robots and software. But the big change was the elimination of millions of middle management white collar jobs. Businesses fired managers, lawyers, spreadsheet jockeys and more. By 2012, businesses realized that they got along just fine with fewer managers. Most of those jobs are gone forever.

So what should someone like my 17 year old neighbor do? Where will the jobs be in our new economy? Is it even worth going to college? What majors are worth taking? And if you do go to college, how do you prepare yourself for success after graduation?

Our economy will have jobs in four major areas:

  1. High paid, high skill jobs like engineers, doctors, scientists, designers, technicians, health care, computer programmers
  2. High paid, high skill trade jobs like plumbers, electricians, mechanics, welders
  3. Working for yourself, with pay ranging from minimum wage to high wages
  4. Low paid, low skill service jobs in restaurants, hotels, stores

We’ll still have manufacturing, finance, business people and lawyers, but each company will need progressively fewer and fewer jobs as these jobs get mechanized and we squeeze out more efficiency from each worker and pay goes down because of increased competition.

If you go to college, go to a good public university and study hard sciences like engineering, physics, biology, astronomy, computer science, medicine, dentistry, nursing or elder care. But what if you don’t like any of those?

If you absolutely don’t like any of the hard sciences or health care and you plan on graduating with a poli sci, english, art history, women’s studies, psychology, journalism or another liberal arts degree, the days of waltzing through university, getting a degree and then getting a good job are over. And going to law school is not the fallback it once was: 55% of 2011 law grads didn’t have law related jobs and 28% were unemployed one year after graduation. You either need to be in the top 5% of all of these degree seekers in smarts, work ethic and perseverance or you need to develop skills outside the classroom. Preferably both.

You need to set yourself apart from the vast majority of your peers who will coast through college and emerge with a piece of paper, a pile of debt and no skills other than binge drinking. Get out in the world. Volunteer. Intern. Work. Start a small business. Take online classes outside of your university. Read books that you’re interested in. Meet people, join clubs.

But don’t do things to check a list or get the credentials like you did in high school. Do it because you think you might like it or to develop skills. The biggest (only?) benefit of taking a liberal arts degree today is that you’ll be exposed to smart, educated, motivated people who you can connect with for life as friends, business contacts, smart people to start a business. Don’t underestimate these benefits.

For example, if you think you might want to be an attorney, take a law and society class. Contact local attorneys to ask to shadow them for a day or intern in their office. You might love it, but you also might hate it. Finding out what you don’t like is just as important as what you actually do like. Learn to communicate, to write, to problem solve, to earn money on your own. To make things happen. Work hard. Figure out how to relate to people. Kill off any vestiges of shyness or timidity. Find something that you truly love to do. Because coming out with a paper degree guarantees you nothing but a huge pile of debt and a wasted four (or more) years of lost earning and learning potential. And avoid small, private, liberal arts colleges like the plague unless absolutely necessary.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)